Flotiq vs Hygraph: Headless CMS Guide 2025

Why choose Flotiq as an alternative to Hygraph?

1. Strong API foundations
Both Flotiq and Hygraph are API-first headless CMS platforms.
Flotiq offers automatically generated RESTful APIs with OpenAPI documentation and SDKs — making it fast to integrate with any frontend framework or backend service. The GraphQL API is more restricted in Flotiq than in Hygraph.
Hygraph is focused exclusively on GraphQL, which can be powerful but less familiar to some development teams.

2. Visual and flexible content modeling
Both platforms provide visual schema editors to build custom content types.
Flotiq makes it easy to define structured content with metadata, relationships, and versioning — ideal for scalable and multilingual projects.
Hygraph also allows flexible modeling but leans into GraphQL conventions that may require more upfront planning.

3. Intuitive content editing for teams
Flotiq and Hygraph both feature modern, editor-friendly interfaces.
Flotiq is designed to help content teams publish faster — with SEO-friendly extensions, easy-to-use editorial workflow, and live content preview integrated in the user interface.
No steep learning curve, and no constant dev support needed for everyday updates.

4. Typescript and Next.js support
Typescript support in Hygraph requires manual effort to setup and their Next.js integration is not as deep as the one offered by Flotiq.
Flotiq provides full-type synchronization between the CMS and your codebase to eliminate the need for manual work which is tedious and error-prone. Flotiq offers a first-class integration with Next.js with full support for Draft mode and live-previews working like a charm!

Comparing Flotiq and Hygraph: Headless CMS Capabilities

See below for a side-by-side comparison of high-level headless CMS capabilities. Scroll down for more details on features for content teams and developers.

Key differences for business decision makers

Pricing Transparency and Predictability

Hygraph's Growth plan starts at $299/month or $199/month when billed annually, with key enterprise features like audit logs, scheduled publishing, and backup recovery available only in the Enterprise tier (custom pricing). For scaling teams, this can lead to unexpected costs as needs grow.

Flotiq offers a transparent pricing structure starting at $39/month or $37/month when billed annually, with advanced features like daily backups (30-day retention), audit logs, and role-based permissions already included in lower paid tiers - giving businesses more control over their budget from day one.

Business continuity

Hygraph restricts backup & restore and instant recovery to the Enterprise tier, which may not be accessible to smaller teams.

Flotiq provides automatic daily backups and data retention features starting from its Basic tier, ensuring that even early-stage or mid-sized teams benefit from operational resilience and reduced downtime risk.

Platform uptime SLA

Hygraph uptime SLA is 99.95% and only available in the Enterprise tier.

Flotiq provides a 99.9% uptime guarantee starting from the lowest-paid tier and 99.99% in higher paid tiers.

Flotiq vs Hygraph – deployment models overview

Hygraph is a cloud-only SaaS platform, which can be a limitation for industries with strict compliance needs (e.g., finance, government, healthcare).

Flotiq offers on-premise and private cloud deployment options, giving enterprises full control over infrastructure, data residency, and compliance requirements.

Flotiq vs Hygraph for Engineering Teams

Flotiq and Hygraph both have an extensive set of features for engineers. Hygraph will feel more comfortable for teams heavily invested into the GraphQL concept of API communication, while developers more familiar with RESTful APIs and OpenAPI or engineers who appreciate Typescript will prefer Flotiq.

Typescript Support in action

Key Takeaways for Engineering Teams

Flotiq vs Hygraph for Content Teams

Hygraph may initially seem like a more friendly choice for content teams or digital marketers, but the feature by feature comparison of Hygraph and Flotiq shows that both systems provide a similar value to the end user.

Key Insights  for Content Teams

Flotiq’s stronger Next.js support means faster preview cycles, reduced dev time, and smoother publishing — giving content teams more confidence and autonomy during campaigns or site updates.

Hygraph offers richer in-editor collaboration (e.g. commenting), which may help larger marketing teams align during content review cycles — though it’s offset by limited live preview capabilities.

Final Thoughts: your CMS should grow with you

Whether you prioritize clean developer workflows, faster time-to-publish for your content team, or pricing that scales with your needs - choosing the right CMS sets the foundation for long-term success.

Both systems offer a similar value for marketers and content editors. Hygraph is going to be an interesting choice for projects with larger budgets and development teams that already have experience building systems with Hygraph and GraphQL. 

For teams that prefer using RESTful APIs, whose focus is on delivery speed and code quality - Flotiq may be a better choice, because of the OpenAPI support and Typescript integration. If your frontend framework is NextJS - Flotiq's integration with Next will significantly improve your workflow.

Additionally - Flotiq offers a much greater value in terms of features critical to running a business like backups, uptime guarantees and support SLAs.

👉 Try Flotiq free today and experience how a modern headless CMS can support your team, your workflows, and your ambitions - from day one.